• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail
  • Careers
  • Press Releases
  • Testimonials
  • Travel Policy
858.587.2874
Ivey Engineering
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Newsletter
    • Press Releases
    • Scholarship Contest
    • Travel Policy
    • Testimonials
  • Expertise
    • Overview
    • HVAC
    • Plumbing
    • Fire Suppression
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Carbon Monoxide
    • Building Codes
    • Design
    • Construction
    • Facility Condition Assessment
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Construction Claims
    • Construction Defects
    • Estimating & Cost Analysis
    • Building System Evaluation
    • Forensic Investigation & Failure Analysis
    • HVAC & Plumbing Design
    • Indoor Cultivation Facility Design
    • Professional Liability
    • Product Testing
  • Our Team
    • Conrad Gonzalez
    • Kevin Hastings, P.E.
    • Nancy Ivey
    • William Ivey, P.E.
    • Jorie Obias-Yambao
    • Joseph Palanca, P.E.
    • Gloria Rodriguez
    • Nova Sevilla
    • David Shreve, P.E.
    • Felix Touza, P.E.
    • Gregory Weintraub
    • Lisa Zollinger
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
    • California Office
    • Florida Office
    • Virginia Office
    • Ask an Expert
    • Request Fee Schedule
    • Request Resume
    • Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Menu Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Newsletter
    • Press Releases
    • Scholarship Contest
    • Travel Policy
    • Testimonials
  • Expertise
    • Overview
    • HVAC
    • Plumbing
    • Fire Suppression
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Carbon Monoxide
    • Building Codes
    • Design
    • Construction
    • Facility Condition Assessment
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Construction Claims
    • Construction Defects
    • Estimating & Cost Analysis
    • Building System Evaluation
    • Forensic Investigation & Failure Analysis
    • HVAC & Plumbing Design
    • Indoor Cultivation Facility Design
    • Professional Liability
    • Product Testing
  • Our Team
    • Conrad Gonzalez
    • Kevin Hastings, P.E.
    • Nancy Ivey
    • William Ivey, P.E.
    • Jorie Obias-Yambao
    • Joseph Palanca, P.E.
    • Gloria Rodriguez
    • Nova Sevilla
    • David Shreve, P.E.
    • Felix Touza, P.E.
    • Gregory Weintraub
    • Lisa Zollinger
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
    • California Office
    • Florida Office
    • Virginia Office
    • Ask an Expert
    • Request Fee Schedule
    • Request Resume
    • Subscribe to Newsletter
A new Toyota sports car

5 Unbelievable Product Liability Lawsuits

in Courtroom/by Lisa Zollinger

Each year thousands of product liability claims are filed, which eventually lead to a plethora of settlements and verdicts being awarded to consumers who have been injured indirectly or directly by faulty or sub-standard products. These lawsuits, filed by consumers like you, require companies to maintain safety standards and spend more resources for product testing. Here we present some notable products that correspond with 5 Unbelievable Product Liability Lawsuits. These cases show how product safety and reliability are crucial and also help you understand your rights as a consumer.

1. Blitz gas cans

Blitz was the largest producer of portable gas cans in the United States. Headquartered in Miami, Oklahoma, this company filed for bankruptcy in mid-2012 because of a barrage of product liability lawsuits against it. Many consumers from different parts of the country have filed cases against the company because the cans would explode when used to pour gas to start a fire. Each of these claims cost the company an average of $4 million and more than 30 cases were filed in 2012 alone causing the company to close its operations.

gasoline cans

2. McDonald’s coffee

The Liebeck v. McDonald’s case of 1994 is one of the most prominent unbelievable product liability cases in U.S. history. In this case, Stella Liebeck accidentally poured hot coffee, purchased from McDonald’s, on her lower body and suffered third degree burns on her thighs, groin and buttocks. Liebeck’s lawyers argued that the company served coffee at a temperature of 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit while other companies served coffee only at a reasonable 140 degrees. Liebeck was awarded a jury verdict of $2.7 million in punitive damages and $160,000 for medical expenses.

 

In 1994, after accidentally spilling hot coffee on her lower body and suffering third degree burns, Stella Liebeck filed a suit against McDonald's, claiming the fast food restaurant served coffee at too high of a temperature.

3. Remington rifle models 700 and 710

The Remington rifle models 700 and 710 were proven to have a faulty fire control system, which caused the rifle to fire even when the trigger wasn’t pulled. All that was needed to fire the rifle was the release of the safety latch, which could easily be released when the rifle was simply bumped or jarred. Many product liability lawsuits have been filed against the Remington Rifle company, but the most prominent jury verdict was $15 million awarded to a Texas man in 1994 when he accidentally shot himself in the right foot while hunting.

remington rifle

4. Ledraplastic balancing ball

In 2009 Francisco Garcia of the Sacramento Kings was balancing on a 75 centimeter Ledraplastic balancing ball along with weights when the ball burst and he was injured. He fractured his right forearm and was unable to play the first four months in his first-year contract with the Kings. The Kings and Garcia filed a product liability claim against Ledraplastic for $4 million in lost salaries and $29.6 million in damages and eventually won the case.

A Sacramento Kings' basketball player filed a product liability case after sustaining injuries from a balancing ball that exploded during a workout.

5. Toyota cars

In 2010, Toyota issued a massive recall for many of its cars. A safety feature known as “brake to idle fail safe” was not installed in many cars and, therefore, increased the chances of an accident when the accelerator malfunctioned. The aim of the fail-safe system is to prompt the engine to ignore the gas pedal when the brakes are pressed, greatly reducing the chances of an accident, even when there is a problem with the accelerator. The failure to include this fail-safe mechanism in many Toyota models resulted in one of the biggest litigation cases in recent history, as well as a class action lawsuit. Toyota agreed to pay a whopping $1.1 billion to settle the suit.

We would love to know what you think of these 5 Unbelievable Product Liability Lawsuits. Have we missed any notable cases, particularly ones that leave you scratching your head? If there’s one that should have made our list, leave a comment below!

Is your company in need of a liability expert who specializes in building construction and design? Check out Ivey Engineering’s professional liability consulting services.

Tags: class action, court case, courtroom, featured, lawsuit, lawsuits, product liablity, settlement, trial, verdict
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
You might also like
the bathroom of celebrity Jenny CraigTop 10 Celebrity Bathrooms You Wished You Owned
man serving as expert witness in a courtroomTop 4 Expert Witness Traits to Consider
Two men discussing a building project at the site6 Tips to Hiring a Building Contractor for a Commercial Project
A Few Good MenTop 10 Glaring Movie Courtroom Mistakes
A constructiion site showing equipment and concrete work5 Reasons to Hire a Construction Claims Consultant
a judge holding a gavel8 Hilarious But True Court Cases You Won’t Believe
4 replies
  1. jason
    jason says:
    December 14, 2014 at 3:11 pm

    looking at these cases, gives me pause; I am an aspiring inventor and looking at these cases is making me second guess being an inventor. I see it like this, if you have a product and you educate the general public on what the product is for and its capabilities, that is the end of your obligations. If the general public cant use their common sense, well it’s on them at that point.

  2. Kathy McGinn Noble
    Kathy McGinn Noble says:
    September 27, 2015 at 12:17 pm

    The Liebeck v. McDonald’s is misleading as reported. Yes, the jury attempted to award Ms. Liebeck 2.7 million dollars (based on two days of coffee sales) as a punitive ruling against McDonald’s because they served the coffee at a temperature they knew to be dangerous. She originally sought to have her medical bills covered, as she was left disabled and disfigured and McDonald’s offered her $800. The temperature was served a temperature ABOVE normal and KNOWN to cause injury if consumed as served. The judge ultimately lowered the award to $650K.

    • Lisa
      Lisa says:
      September 30, 2015 at 2:53 pm

      Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will review the article and make changes as necessary.

  3. Lisa
    Lisa says:
    May 16, 2017 at 4:26 pm

    So glad you found the article useful!

Comments are closed.

CONNECT on LinkedIn
FOLLOW on Twitter
CONNECT on Facebook

Recent Blog Posts

  • High rise building with lights on6 Ways to Reduce the Cost of Energy in Commercial BuildingsFebruary 16, 2023 - 4:56 pm
  • outlet with plug on fire6 Tips to Help Prevent a Home or Building FireOctober 31, 2022 - 4:59 pm
  • white pipe leaking water4 Common Causes of Mold in Buildings or HomesSeptember 23, 2022 - 2:15 pm
  • old copper gas boiler6 Most Common Causes of Carbon Monoxide PoisoningDecember 21, 2021 - 3:49 pm

Categories

  • Community
  • Construction
  • Courtroom
  • Electrical
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Fire & Life Safety
  • Fire Protection
  • HVAC
  • Newsletter
  • Plumbing
  • Press Releases
  • Sustainable Living

Archives

Tags

architecture bathroom buildings claim class action comedy court case courtroom drama energy consumption energy efficiency environmentally friendly expert witness featured fire & life safety fire protection hilarious history home house HVAC lawsuit massive irrigation system master bathroom medical imaging mistakes modern modern plumbing systems movies opinion plastic pipe plumbing plumbing code plumbing systems plumbing videos problems rainwater harvesting remodel project renewable sources renovation settlement solar panels sustainability trial verdict

About Us

Ivey Engineering, based in San Diego, California, with offices in Tampa, Florida and Richmond, Virginia, has performed expert witness and forensic consulting services since 1994. IEI serves clients in over 30 states. Our staff is comprised of engineers, former construction executives and service and repair professionals who are licensed in various states.

Get in Touch

Phone: 858.587.2874

Fax: 858.587.6749

E-mail: [email protected]

Address: 8330 Juniper Creek Lane

San Diego, CA 92126

From Our Blog

  • High rise building with lights on6 Ways to Reduce the Cost of Energy in Commercial BuildingsFebruary 16, 2023 - 4:56 pm
  • outlet with plug on fire6 Tips to Help Prevent a Home or Building FireOctober 31, 2022 - 4:59 pm
  • white pipe leaking water4 Common Causes of Mold in Buildings or HomesSeptember 23, 2022 - 2:15 pm
© Copyright 2023 - Ivey Engineering Inc.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Expertise
  • Services
  • Our Team
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
5 Worst Movie Examples of Expert Witnessesverdict paul newman movie expert witnessA constructiion site showing equipment and concrete work5 Reasons to Hire a Construction Claims Consultant
Scroll to top